ZIGEUNERWEISEN

Composer(s): Various

Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Stefan De Schepper, Thomas Fabry, Ilonka Kolthof, Ann-Sofie Verhoyen
Reference: KTC1701
Barcode: 8720366000545
Format: 1 CD
Release date: 2021-01-29
SKU: KTC1701 Categories: , , , , , , , , , , ,

 21,50

Peter Verhoyen piccolo (all tracks)
Thomas Fabry piccolo (5)
Anke Lauwers piccolo (6)
Ilonka Kolthof piccolo (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
Stefan De Schepper piano (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
Ann-Sofie Verhoyen harp (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)
Zigeunerweisen: between myth and controversy

I would say that what you call gypsy music is not gypsy music, but relatively recent Hungarian art music.

Béla Bartók at a meeting of the Hungarian Ethnographic Society, 29 April 1931 When Bartók opened his lecture entitled Gypsy music? Hungarian music? with this controversial statement, he lit the fuse of a discussion that had been raging since the middle of the 19th century. The central question of this discussion was the indistinct and ever-changing boundary between the Hungarian musical legacy and Roma music. Some seventy years earlier, Franz Liszt had revived the debate with his book Des Bohémiens et de leur musique en Hongrie (1859), in which he stated that such a boundary was an illusion: there was no Hungarian folk music that was not gypsy music. By Bartók’s time, however, the discussion had become much more complex: the Hungarian music heritage had in the meantime inspired a new national style whose authenticity had come to be questioned. What, exactly, had served as its model? Original folk music or a non-historical variant that had grown with the Roma tradition? Gypsy music? Hungarian music?

The Hungarian question is just one example of the problems with which a notion such as gypsy music struggles, simply because the “gypsy” is not a historical reality but a false generalisation. When the Roma migrated from India to Persia and then spread throughout Europe during the Middle Ages, they swiftly formed sub-groups, each of which had its own cultural identity. While the communities took care to preserve their separate identities, they also adopted traditions from their host countries, as can be seen in the diversity of their musical practices. For example, the Irish Roma repertoire is linked to the folk song tradition, Spanish Roma have their own type of flamenco and the bagpipes play a leading role in Scottish Roma music. Gypsy music takes many forms, but some characteristics nonetheless rise above the various traditions, such as the use of rhapsodic structures with striking tempo changes, a quasi-improvisatory style of writing and rubato performance. Also seen as characteristic are strongly accentuated and syncopated rhythms, long pauses and sustained tones, modal twists and rich ornamentation. Roma music, being full of temperament, capricious, asymmetrical and unpredictable, seems to go against every expectation. This musical representation of a culture that refuses to accommodate itself to Western norms intrigued composers more and more as the 19th century advanced.

1. Fantaisie Pastorale Hongroise
Composer: Franz Doppler
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Stefan De Schepper

2. Zigeunerweisen (1878)
Composer: Pablo de Sarasate
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Stefan De Schepper

3. Tzigane (1924)
Composer: Maurice Ravel
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Stefan De Schepper

4. Csárdás (1904)
Composer: Vittorio Monti
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Stefan De Schepper

5. Hungarian Dance Nr. 5 (1879)
Composer: Johannes Brahms
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Stefan De Schepper, Thomas Fabry

6. Hungarian Dance Nr. 6 (1879)
Composer: Anke Lauwers/Johannes Brahms
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Stefan De Schepper

7. Duos (1931) – Ugyan Édes Komámasszony (Teasing Song)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ilonka Kolthof

8. Duos (1931) – Burleszk (Burlesque)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ilonka Kolthof

9. Duos (1931) – Magyar Nóta (Hungarian Song)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ilonka Kolthof

10. Duos (1931) – Szól a Duda (Bagpipes)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ilonka Kolthof

11. Duos (1931) – Arab Dal (Arabischer Gesang)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ilonka Kolthof

12. Balada (1950)
Composer: György Ligeti
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ilonka Kolthof

13. Romanian Dances – Jocul Cu Bâta (Stick Dance)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ann-Sofie Verhoyen

14. Romanian Dances – Brâul (Sash Dance)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ann-Sofie Verhoyen

15. Romanian Dances – Pe Loc (In One Spot)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ann-Sofie Verhoyen

16. Romanian Dances – Buciumeana (Dance from Bucsum)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ann-Sofie Verhoyen

17. Romanian Dances – Poarga Româneasca (Romanian Polka)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ann-Sofie Verhoyen

18. Romanian Dances – Ma Runt El (Fast Dance)
Composer: Béla Bartók
Artist(s): Peter Verhoyen, Ann-Sofie Verhoyen

Artists

, , , ,

Composers

, , , , , ,

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “ZIGEUNERWEISEN”
Shopping Cart
ZIGEUNERWEISEN
 21,50
Peter Verhoyen piccolo (all tracks)
Thomas Fabry piccolo (5)
Anke Lauwers piccolo (6)
Ilonka Kolthof piccolo (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
Stefan De Schepper piano (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
Ann-Sofie Verhoyen harp (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)
Zigeunerweisen: between myth and controversy

I would say that what you call gypsy music is not gypsy music, but relatively recent Hungarian art music.

Béla Bartók at a meeting of the Hungarian Ethnographic Society, 29 April 1931 When Bartók opened his lecture entitled Gypsy music? Hungarian music? with this controversial statement, he lit the fuse of a discussion that had been raging since the middle of the 19th century. The central question of this discussion was the indistinct and ever-changing boundary between the Hungarian musical legacy and Roma music. Some seventy years earlier, Franz Liszt had revived the debate with his book Des Bohémiens et de leur musique en Hongrie (1859), in which he stated that such a boundary was an illusion: there was no Hungarian folk music that was not gypsy music. By Bartók’s time, however, the discussion had become much more complex: the Hungarian music heritage had in the meantime inspired a new national style whose authenticity had come to be questioned. What, exactly, had served as its model? Original folk music or a non-historical variant that had grown with the Roma tradition? Gypsy music? Hungarian music?

The Hungarian question is just one example of the problems with which a notion such as gypsy music struggles, simply because the “gypsy” is not a historical reality but a false generalisation. When the Roma migrated from India to Persia and then spread throughout Europe during the Middle Ages, they swiftly formed sub-groups, each of which had its own cultural identity. While the communities took care to preserve their separate identities, they also adopted traditions from their host countries, as can be seen in the diversity of their musical practices. For example, the Irish Roma repertoire is linked to the folk song tradition, Spanish Roma have their own type of flamenco and the bagpipes play a leading role in Scottish Roma music. Gypsy music takes many forms, but some characteristics nonetheless rise above the various traditions, such as the use of rhapsodic structures with striking tempo changes, a quasi-improvisatory style of writing and rubato performance. Also seen as characteristic are strongly accentuated and syncopated rhythms, long pauses and sustained tones, modal twists and rich ornamentation. Roma music, being full of temperament, capricious, asymmetrical and unpredictable, seems to go against every expectation. This musical representation of a culture that refuses to accommodate itself to Western norms intrigued composers more and more as the 19th century advanced.